Skip to main content

Facebook "High Quality" Image Upload

I recently uploaded some holiday snaps to Facebook for everyone to have a look at, and noticed something a bit amiss. I made sure to check the "High quality" checkbox. I made sure I exported the image at a size suitable for Facebook without it having to be resized. And yet the amount of noise added by Facebook's "high quality" image algorithms to produce exactly the same image is mind-boggling.

This is the original, weighing in at 102KB:

And this is the one Facebook delivers to viewers, weighing in at 40KB:

Can you tell the difference? Even when zoomed in? No? Well, I can, because I'm a persnickety perfectionist. And so I did an experiment. Taking each image, overlaying one on top of the other and using a "difference" filter, I produced an image detailing the places where the images differ.

Quite a lot of noise considering it's supposed to be delivering high quality images. But wait, there's more. If I use the Levels slider to increase the overall brightness of the noise image, you'll see that there is hardly a pixel in the image that is not affected by JPEG compression artefacts and blocking.

Bonkers. Of course, I only use Facebook for sharing family snapshots with people in a (relatively) private way. I don't much care if it's a bit low quality. But considering this is the much touted "high quality photo experience" that reckons to given higher resolution and better quality, it's not much to shout about.


Popular posts from this blog

Another canal walk

The sun has started being a little more present lately, so some mornings are actually quite pleasant. On one such morning I decided to have a wander up the canal.

The clouds made everything look a bit Toy Story, and the low sun gave a lovely light and contrast to everything else.

Of course, it wasn't sunny everywhere. But even in the darker places, such as right underneath Leeds railway station, the sun had a go at peeking in.

Shooting the Enterprise

I was recently asked if I could help out providing an image for a magazine article about stress management. For reasons as yet undiscovered the requested image would be of the USS Enterprise flying through a storm in space. Unfortunately I didn't have a lot of time (just a couple of hours), but I did have a very nice model of the Enterprise D I could use to build the image around.

Thinking fast, I rigged up a rather slapdash rig consisting of a black reflector backdrop, an umbrella and stand from which dangled the model by a thread, and a couple of strobes. One light above, diffused, to provide the key light, and another, reflected and lower power, to fill some of the very dark shadows. It ended up all looking something like this:

Using a fast shutter, f/16 and cunning flash positioning I managed to keep the background black and give the model suitably textured lighting so it didn't have that flat, uniform, shadowless appearance of, well, a model. The narrow aperture obviously…

Leeds Hyperbeastly

It's been five long months since I posted anything to this blog. Including this post here, I have posted no less than three times in 2014. As you can tell, I am nothing if not prolific.
A lot has changed since the last time I posted anything. I sold all my SLR gear, for a start, and switched to micro four-thirds. I got a lovely, lovely little Olympus OM-D E-M10 and a small selection of lenses including the must-have Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 pancake and the stunning Olympus 45mm f/1.8. Marvellous, and the camera, four lenses and spare batteries and SD cards in a bag that wouldn't fit the SLR and a single lens. Cracking stuff, because it's now small enough to carry all the time. In fact the body and pancake lens is barely bigger than my Fuji X10 compact!
Anyway, the point of this post; I've taken several walks through Leeds while I've worked there over the past few years and I've been finding it more and more difficult to find non-boring subjects. Everything is so dr…